Canada,
You say:
I'm hoping yoru not trying to force me to agree with you on this it's one mans opion/females too.lol

How can I force you or anyone to agree with me, honestly????

The problem is that this isn't a common sense competition. If it was one then I'd agree that my common sense is no better than yours. But, this is not about common sense or natural intelligence - it's about experience with ENS and significant research. You may agree with me or not, I honestly don't care, but you have to at least acknowledge that I have much much much more experience with ENS (not just personal but also and especially having corresponded intensively over eleven years with dozens of ENS sufferers, I reckon close to 100) and what's more I took the trouble to spend 4 years researching nasal anatomy and physiology and everything that has ever been written on the turbinates, ENS, atrophic rhinitis and turbinectomies and have discussed these issues with dozens of ENTs and plastic surgeons, before I even dared to have an opinion...
I'm not saying all this to brag. The last thing I ever planned to do was to study the nose and ENS so seriously, but I had to, because I simply refuse to come to terms with living with ENS and I desperately want to solve it.

Now look at it please from my point of view:
Imagine you are me and have done all these years of research, then along comes someone like you, who has just a few months ago joined this forum and found out he may or may not have ENS, plus he has not done 1% of the research I have, let alone until a few moths ago he didn't even know what a turbinate was, yet he assumes that he can argue with me over everything I say regarding ENS, as if we were on the same level of knowledge and experience.

I think you can see my point Canada. And what's more annoying is that the things you say indicate clearly that you don't even know yet what the gross inner nasal anatomy looks like, let alone - the composition of tissue layers. the net work of nasal blood supply and the nervous innervation of the nose and how this effects the turbinates.
You see - it's not right to say innocently - "this is my opinion and yours is yours and everyone is entitled to their opinion..." - because the opinions you are expressing are on anatomy and physiology of the nose which you have not researched and know nothing about. You're making factual statements on facts that you simply know nothing about, as if it was a political or theological debate. By doing so - you are confusing and misleading other ENS sufferers and upsetting the level of discussion.

Do you want an example:
can you honestly say that you know what a turbinate is made of - what are it's tissue layers, how are they organized, what kind of blood vessels innervate it, what kind of nerves, what kind of immune system cells, what kind of glands, what does the bone look like, where is it connected to, what is the nasal valve, how does the nose sense the airflow and it's temperature, how do we smell, whats the connection between smell and airflow sensation, what attempts (surgical and otherwise) have been done in history to treat ENS or atrophic rhinitis and what were their results and stats, what's the neural connection between the nose and the lungs and how does this apply to ENS ??? and there is much more..... - all things that I made a point to seriously study and master before I even dared to say anything about ENS. Get the drift?

How do you assume you can make an informed and wise decision about what to implant, how much and where, when you know nothing of the things I mentioned?

PS:
If you understood anything about my replies to Anthony and his replies to me you'd understand that there isn't any significant difference of opinions between us on any subject, so please stop trying to drive a wedge between us and create little petty alliances and coalitions. This isn't a social club or the TV program "survival"...